Through Personal Testament, 'Why Religion?' Explores Belief In The 21st Century, TOM GJELTEN, November 7, 2018, NPR News
-. -. -. -
Pagels's interpretation of what it may mean to be a Christian, however, is clearly unconventional. She acknowledges that the gospel writer whose thoughts she found most helpful sees suffering "as Buddhists do." She barely mentions Jesus Christ and does not discuss the need for personal salvation, as evangelicals routinely do. When she began to conclude that the Christian tradition contained "much that may be of value, and much that may not," a self-described "Bible-believing" Christian scolded her. "Picking and choosing is self-indulgent," he said. "We call it cafeteria Christianity, since people who do that simply refuse to accept the whole tradition as it stands."
-. -. -. -. -
This passage stuck out to me because I also find the Buddhist view of suffering compelling. I am pleased that she as a scholar apparently found this in ancient texts such as the Gnostic gospels. I am most attracted to modern Christian writers that have a similar explanation instead of the common view that God has a purpose in our suffering. While we may find meaning in terrible circumstances, I have no interest in a god who manipulates the lives of humans in that way.
The pick and choose attitude is somewhat funny also. The Council of Nicea in the Third Century picked for us. Lots of richness was lost as we can see from the suppression of the Gnostic Gospels. If we didn't pick and choose, there would only be the Catholic Church. Most fundamentalist don't realize what a recent creation their form of Christianity is, dating back just a hundred or so years.
Terry Gross on fresh air also recently interviewed Elaine pagels so I would like to listen to that interview.